chess/planning/analysis/success-metrics.md
Christoph Wagner 5ad0700b41 refactor: Consolidate repository structure - flatten from workspace pattern
Restructured project from nested workspace pattern to flat single-repo layout.
This eliminates redundant nesting and consolidates all project files under version control.

## Migration Summary

**Before:**
```
alex/ (workspace, not versioned)
├── chess-game/ (git repo)
│   ├── js/, css/, tests/
│   └── index.html
└── docs/ (planning, not versioned)
```

**After:**
```
alex/ (git repo, everything versioned)
├── js/, css/, tests/
├── index.html
├── docs/ (project documentation)
├── planning/ (historical planning docs)
├── .gitea/ (CI/CD)
└── CLAUDE.md (configuration)
```

## Changes Made

### Structure Consolidation
- Moved all chess-game/ contents to root level
- Removed redundant chess-game/ subdirectory
- Flattened directory structure (eliminated one nesting level)

### Documentation Organization
- Moved chess-game/docs/ → docs/ (project documentation)
- Moved alex/docs/ → planning/ (historical planning documents)
- Added CLAUDE.md (workspace configuration)
- Added IMPLEMENTATION_PROMPT.md (original project prompt)

### Version Control Improvements
- All project files now under version control
- Planning documents preserved in planning/ folder
- Merged .gitignore files (workspace + project)
- Added .claude/ agent configurations

### File Updates
- Updated .gitignore to include both workspace and project excludes
- Moved README.md to root level
- All import paths remain functional (relative paths unchanged)

## Benefits

 **Simpler Structure** - One level of nesting removed
 **Complete Versioning** - All documentation now in git
 **Standard Layout** - Matches open-source project conventions
 **Easier Navigation** - Direct access to all project files
 **CI/CD Compatible** - All workflows still functional

## Technical Validation

-  Node.js environment verified
-  Dependencies installed successfully
-  Dev server starts and responds
-  All core files present and accessible
-  Git repository functional

## Files Preserved

**Implementation Files:**
- js/ (3,517 lines of code)
- css/ (4 stylesheets)
- tests/ (87 test cases)
- index.html
- package.json

**CI/CD Pipeline:**
- .gitea/workflows/ci.yml
- .gitea/workflows/release.yml

**Documentation:**
- docs/ (12+ documentation files)
- planning/ (historical planning materials)
- README.md

**Configuration:**
- jest.config.js, babel.config.cjs, playwright.config.js
- .gitignore (merged)
- CLAUDE.md

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-23 10:05:26 +01:00

792 lines
19 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Success Metrics: HTML Chess Game
## Executive Summary
**Measurement Framework**: SMART metrics across 6 categories
**KPIs**: 32 key performance indicators
**Success Threshold**: 70% of critical metrics met
**Review Frequency**: Weekly sprints, monthly milestones
---
## 1. Success Criteria Framework
### SMART Metrics Definition:
- **S**pecific: Clear, unambiguous measure
- **M**easurable: Quantifiable data
- **A**chievable: Realistic given constraints
- **R**elevant: Aligned with project goals
- **T**ime-bound: Deadline for achievement
---
## 2. Technical Success Metrics
### 2.1 Code Quality (Weight: 25%)
#### M1: Test Coverage
**Target**: ≥ 90% | **Measurement**: Jest coverage report | **Priority**: CRITICAL
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- Chess engine (move validation): ≥ 95%
- AI engine (minimax): ≥ 85%
- UI components: ≥ 80%
- Utility functions: ≥ 95%
**Measurement Method**:
```bash
npm test -- --coverage
# Output: Coverage summary
```
**Success Thresholds**:
- ✅ Excellent: ≥ 90%
- ⚠️ Acceptable: 80-89%
- ❌ Needs Improvement: < 80%
**Current Baseline**: TBD (measure after Phase 1)
---
#### M2: Zero Critical Bugs
**Target**: 0 bugs | **Measurement**: Bug tracker | **Priority**: CRITICAL
**Bug Severity Definitions**:
- **Critical**: Game unplayable, data loss, crashes
- **High**: Major feature broken, incorrect rules
- **Medium**: UI issues, minor rule violations
- **Low**: Cosmetic issues, typos
**Success Criteria**:
- 0 critical bugs in production
- < 3 high-severity bugs
- < 10 medium-severity bugs
- Low bugs acceptable
**Measurement Method**: GitHub Issues with severity labels
---
#### M3: Code Maintainability
**Target**: A grade | **Measurement**: Static analysis | **Priority**: HIGH
**Metrics**:
- Cyclomatic complexity: < 15 per function
- Lines per file: < 500
- Function length: < 50 lines
- Comment density: 10-20%
**Tools**:
- ESLint (linting)
- SonarQube or CodeClimate (complexity)
- Manual code review
**Success Thresholds**:
- A Grade: All metrics within targets
- B Grade: 1-2 metrics slightly over
- C Grade: Multiple violations
---
#### M4: Chess Rules Compliance
**Target**: 100% | **Measurement**: Test suite | **Priority**: CRITICAL
**Test Cases**:
- All piece movements (100+ test cases)
- Special moves (castling, en passant, promotion)
- Check/checkmate/stalemate detection
- Draw conditions (50-move, repetition, insufficient material)
**Success Criteria**:
- Pass all FIDE rule tests
- Validate against known positions (Lichess puzzle database)
- No illegal moves possible
**Measurement Method**:
```javascript
describe('FIDE Rules Compliance', () => {
test('All legal moves are allowed', () => {...});
test('All illegal moves are blocked', () => {...});
test('Edge cases handled correctly', () => {...});
});
```
---
### 2.2 Performance Metrics (Weight: 20%)
#### M5: Page Load Time
**Target**: < 1s | **Measurement**: Lighthouse | **Priority**: HIGH
**Metrics**:
- First Contentful Paint (FCP): < 500ms
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): < 1s
- Time to Interactive (TTI): < 2s
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): < 0.1
**Measurement Method**:
```bash
lighthouse https://your-chess-app.com --view
```
**Success Thresholds**:
- Excellent: All metrics green (Lighthouse 90+)
- Acceptable: 1-2 yellow metrics (Lighthouse 70-89)
- Needs Work: Red metrics (Lighthouse < 70)
**Current Baseline**: TBD (measure after deployment)
---
#### M6: AI Response Time
**Target**: < 1s (beginner), < 2s (intermediate) | **Measurement**: Performance API | **Priority**: CRITICAL
**Targets by Difficulty**:
- Beginner AI (depth 3-4): < 500ms
- Intermediate AI (depth 5-6): < 1.5s
- Advanced AI (depth 7+): < 5s
**Measurement Method**:
```javascript
const start = performance.now();
const move = calculateBestMove(position, depth);
const duration = performance.now() - start;
console.log(`AI calculated in ${duration}ms`);
```
**Success Criteria**:
- 95th percentile under target
- Median under target, p95 over
- Median over target
**Device Targets**:
- Desktop: Full performance
- Mobile (high-end): 1.5x slower acceptable
- Mobile (low-end): 2.5x slower acceptable
---
#### M7: Frame Rate (Animations)
**Target**: 60fps | **Measurement**: Chrome DevTools | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- Piece movement: 60fps (16ms/frame)
- Highlights: 60fps
- Occasional dips to 50fps acceptable
- Consistent < 30fps unacceptable
**Measurement Method**:
```javascript
let frameCount = 0;
let lastTime = performance.now();
function measureFPS() {
frameCount++;
const now = performance.now();
if (now - lastTime >= 1000) {
console.log(`FPS: ${frameCount}`);
frameCount = 0;
lastTime = now;
}
requestAnimationFrame(measureFPS);
}
```
**Success Threshold**:
- Average FPS 58
- Average FPS 45-57
- Average FPS < 45
---
#### M8: Memory Usage
**Target**: < 50MB | **Measurement**: Chrome DevTools | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- Initial load: < 20MB
- After 50 moves: < 40MB
- After 100 moves: < 60MB
- No memory leaks (stable over time)
**Measurement Method**:
Chrome DevTools Memory Take heap snapshot
**Success Criteria**:
- Memory stable after 10 minutes
- Slow growth (< 1MB/min)
- Memory leak (> 5MB/min)
---
#### M9: Bundle Size
**Target**: < 100KB | **Measurement**: Build output | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Component Breakdown**:
- HTML: < 5KB
- CSS: < 10KB
- JavaScript: < 60KB
- Assets (SVG pieces): < 25KB
- **Total (gzipped)**: < 40KB
**Measurement Method**:
```bash
du -h dist/*
gzip -c dist/main.js | wc -c
```
**Success Thresholds**:
- Excellent: < 100KB uncompressed
- Acceptable: 100-200KB
- Needs Optimization: > 200KB
---
### 2.3 Reliability Metrics (Weight: 15%)
#### M10: Uptime (if hosted)
**Target**: 99.9% | **Measurement**: UptimeRobot | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Acceptable Downtime**:
- Per month: < 43 minutes
- Per week: < 10 minutes
- Per day: < 1.5 minutes
**Measurement Method**: Automated monitoring service
---
#### M11: Browser Compatibility
**Target**: 95% support | **Measurement**: Manual testing | **Priority**: HIGH
**Supported Browsers**:
- Chrome/Edge (last 2 versions): Full support
- Firefox (last 2 versions): Full support
- Safari (last 2 versions): Full support
- Mobile Safari iOS 14+: Full support
- Chrome Android: Full support
**Success Criteria**:
- No game-breaking bugs in supported browsers
- Minor visual differences acceptable
- Core features broken
**Measurement Method**: BrowserStack testing matrix
---
#### M12: Error Rate
**Target**: < 0.1% | **Measurement**: Error tracking (Sentry) | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Metrics**:
- JavaScript errors per 1000 sessions: < 1
- Failed moves: 0 (should be validated)
- UI crashes: 0
**Measurement Method**:
```javascript
window.addEventListener('error', (event) => {
// Log to error tracking service
console.error('Error:', event.error);
});
```
**Success Threshold**:
- < 0.1% error rate
- 0.1-0.5% error rate
- > 0.5% error rate
---
## 3. User Experience Metrics (Weight: 20%)
### 3.1 Usability Metrics
#### M13: Time to First Move
**Target**: < 30s | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: HIGH
**User Journey**:
1. Land on page (0s)
2. Understand it's a chess game (2-5s)
3. Click first piece (10-20s)
4. Make first move (20-30s)
**Success Criteria**:
- Median time < 30s
- Median time 30-60s
- Median time > 60s
**Measurement Method**:
```javascript
const pageLoadTime = performance.timing.navigationStart;
const firstMoveTime = Date.now();
const timeToFirstMove = firstMoveTime - pageLoadTime;
```
---
#### M14: Completion Rate
**Target**: > 60% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Definition**: % of started games that reach checkmate/stalemate/resignation
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ > 70% completion rate
- ⚠️ 50-70% completion rate
-< 50% completion rate
**Baseline Expectation**:
- Beginner AI: 80% (users play to conclusion)
- Intermediate AI: 60% (some abandon if losing)
- Advanced AI: 40% (frustration leads to abandonment)
---
#### M15: User Satisfaction Score (SUS)
**Target**: > 70 | **Measurement**: User survey | **Priority**: HIGH
**System Usability Scale (SUS) Survey**:
10 questions, 1-5 scale, industry-standard
**Questions**:
1. I think I would like to use this system frequently
2. I found the system unnecessarily complex (reverse)
3. I thought the system was easy to use
4. I think I would need support to use this system (reverse)
5. I found the various functions well integrated
... (standard SUS questions)
**Success Thresholds**:
- ✅ SUS > 80 (Excellent)
- ⚠️ SUS 68-80 (Good)
- ✅ SUS > 70 (Acceptable - our target)
- ❌ SUS < 68 (Below average)
**Measurement Method**: Post-game survey (optional popup)
---
#### M16: Net Promoter Score (NPS)
**Target**: > 50 | **Measurement**: Survey | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Question**: "How likely are you to recommend this chess game to a friend?" (0-10)
**Calculation**:
- Promoters (9-10): % of respondents
- Detractors (0-6): % of respondents
- NPS = % Promoters - % Detractors
**Success Thresholds**:
- ✅ NPS > 50 (Excellent)
- ⚠️ NPS 20-50 (Good)
- ✅ NPS > 0 (Acceptable - our target)
- ❌ NPS < 0 (Needs improvement)
---
#### M17: Task Success Rate
**Target**: > 95% | **Measurement**: User testing | **Priority**: HIGH
**Tasks**:
1. Start a new game (100% should succeed)
2. Make a legal move (100%)
3. Undo a move (98%)
4. Change difficulty (95%)
5. Understand when in check (90%)
6. Recognize checkmate (90%)
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ All tasks > 90% success rate
- ⚠️ 1-2 tasks 80-90%
- ❌ Any task < 80%
**Measurement Method**: 5-10 user testing sessions, record successes
---
### 3.2 Engagement Metrics
#### M18: Average Session Duration
**Target**: > 5 minutes | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Expectations**:
- Quick game: 3-5 minutes
- Normal game: 10-15 minutes
- Long game: 20+ minutes
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ Median session > 8 minutes
- ⚠️ Median session 5-8 minutes
- ❌ Median session < 5 minutes (users leaving quickly)
---
#### M19: Games per Session
**Target**: > 2 | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ Average > 2.5 games/session (high engagement)
- ⚠️ Average 1.5-2.5 games
- ❌ Average < 1.5 games (play once and leave)
---
#### M20: Return Rate (7-day)
**Target**: > 30% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Definition**: % of users who return within 7 days
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ > 40% return rate
- ⚠️ 30-40% return rate
-< 30% return rate
**Measurement Method**: Cookie/localStorage tracking (privacy-respecting)
---
## 4. Feature Adoption Metrics (Weight: 10%)
#### M21: AI Mode Usage
**Target**: > 60% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Definition**: % of users who play at least one game vs AI
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ > 70% try AI mode
- ⚠️ 50-70% try AI mode
-< 50% (AI feature underutilized)
---
#### M22: Undo Usage Rate
**Target**: 20-40% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: LOW
**Definition**: % of moves that are undone
**Interpretation**:
- < 10%: Users afraid to use (bad UX)
- 20-40%: Healthy usage (learning, correcting)
- > 60%: Overused (too easy? unclear rules?)
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ 20-40% undo rate
- ⚠️ 10-20% or 40-60%
-< 10% or > 60%
---
#### M23: Feature Discovery Rate
**Target**: > 80% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Features to Track**:
- New game button: 100%
- Undo button: 80%+
- Difficulty selector: 70%+
- Flip board: 30%+
- Settings: 50%+
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ All core features > 80% discovery
- ⚠️ 1-2 features 60-80%
- ❌ Core features < 60%
---
## 5. Business/Project Metrics (Weight: 10%)
### 5.1 Development Metrics
#### M24: Velocity (Story Points/Sprint)
**Target**: Consistent | **Measurement**: Sprint tracking | **Priority**: HIGH
**Measurement**:
- Track story points completed per sprint
- Calculate average velocity
- Monitor variance
**Success Criteria**:
- Velocity stable 20%)
- Velocity fluctuates 40%)
- Velocity highly unpredictable (> 50% variance)
**Baseline**: Establish in first 2 sprints
---
#### M25: Sprint Goal Achievement
**Target**: > 80% | **Measurement**: Sprint retrospective | **Priority**: HIGH
**Definition**: % of sprint goals fully completed
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ > 90% of sprints hit goals
- ⚠️ 70-90% of sprints
-< 70% of sprints
---
#### M26: Technical Debt Ratio
**Target**: < 5% | **Measurement**: Time tracking | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Definition**: Time spent fixing bugs/refactoring vs building features
**Success Criteria**:
- < 5% time on debt
- 5-15% time on debt
- > 15% time on debt (too much debt)
---
#### M27: Deadline Adherence
**Target**: 100% | **Measurement**: Project milestones | **Priority**: CRITICAL
**Milestones**:
- MVP (Week 6): ±1 week acceptable
- Phase 2 (Week 10): ±1 week acceptable
- Phase 3 (Week 14): ±2 weeks acceptable
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ All milestones within buffer
- ⚠️ 1 milestone delayed > buffer
- ❌ Multiple delayed or major delay
---
### 5.2 Adoption Metrics
#### M28: Total Users (if public)
**Target**: 1000 in first month | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Growth Targets**:
- Week 1: 100 users
- Week 2: 300 users
- Week 4: 1000 users
- Month 3: 5000 users
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ Hit growth targets
- ⚠️ 50-80% of targets
-< 50% of targets
---
#### M29: Bounce Rate
**Target**: < 40% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: MEDIUM
**Definition**: % of users who leave without interacting
**Success Criteria**:
- < 30% bounce rate
- 30-50% bounce rate
- > 50% bounce rate
---
#### M30: Referral Traffic
**Target**: > 20% | **Measurement**: Analytics | **Priority**: LOW
**Definition**: % of traffic from referrals (not direct/search)
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ > 30% referral traffic (good word-of-mouth)
- ⚠️ 15-30% referral traffic
-< 15% (not being shared)
---
## 6. Accessibility Metrics (Weight: 5%)
#### M31: WCAG 2.1 Compliance
**Target**: AA level | **Measurement**: Automated + manual testing | **Priority**: HIGH
**Requirements**:
- Color contrast ratio: 4.5:1
- Keyboard navigation: Full support
- Screen reader compatibility: ARIA labels
- Alt text on images: 100%
- Focus indicators: Visible
**Success Criteria**:
- WCAG AA compliant (0-3 violations)
- Minor violations (4-10)
- Major violations (> 10)
**Tools**:
- axe DevTools
- Lighthouse accessibility audit
- Manual screen reader testing
---
#### M32: Keyboard Navigation Success
**Target**: 100% | **Measurement**: Manual testing | **Priority**: HIGH
**Tasks**:
- Tab through all interactive elements
- Select piece with keyboard
- Move piece with keyboard
- Access all menus/buttons
- No keyboard traps
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ All tasks possible without mouse
- ⚠️ 1-2 minor issues
- ❌ Critical features inaccessible
---
## 7. Measurement Dashboard
### Weekly Metrics Review:
- [ ] Test coverage (M1)
- [ ] Critical bugs (M2)
- [ ] AI response time (M6)
- [ ] Sprint velocity (M24)
- [ ] Sprint goal achievement (M25)
### Monthly Metrics Review:
- [ ] All technical metrics (M1-M12)
- [ ] User satisfaction (M15)
- [ ] Engagement metrics (M18-M20)
- [ ] Milestone adherence (M27)
- [ ] Accessibility compliance (M31-M32)
### Release Metrics (Before Deployment):
- [ ] 100% chess rules compliance (M4)
- [ ] Lighthouse score > 90 (M5)
- [ ] Zero critical bugs (M2)
- [ ] Cross-browser testing (M11)
- [ ] WCAG AA compliance (M31)
---
## 8. Success Scorecard
### Critical Metrics (Must Pass All):
1. ✅ Test coverage ≥ 90% (M1)
2. ✅ Zero critical bugs (M2)
3. ✅ 100% chess rules compliance (M4)
4. ✅ AI response time < targets (M6)
5. Lighthouse > 90 (M5)
6. ✅ Deadline adherence (M27)
**Result**: PASS/FAIL (all must pass for successful release)
### High Priority Metrics (≥ 80% Must Pass):
- Code maintainability (M3)
- Frame rate 60fps (M7)
- Browser compatibility (M11)
- Time to first move < 30s (M13)
- Task success rate > 95% (M17)
- Keyboard navigation (M32)
**Result**: 6/8 must pass (75%)
### Medium Priority Metrics (≥ 60% Should Pass):
- Bundle size (M9)
- Memory usage (M8)
- Completion rate (M14)
- Session duration (M18)
- Feature adoption (M21-M23)
**Result**: Nice-to-have, doesn't block release
---
## 9. Data Collection Methods
### Automated Metrics:
```javascript
// Performance monitoring
window.addEventListener('load', () => {
const perfData = performance.timing;
const loadTime = perfData.loadEventEnd - perfData.navigationStart;
logMetric('page_load_time', loadTime);
});
// User actions
function trackMove(from, to) {
logEvent('move_made', { from, to, timestamp: Date.now() });
}
// Session tracking
const sessionStart = Date.now();
window.addEventListener('beforeunload', () => {
const sessionDuration = Date.now() - sessionStart;
logMetric('session_duration', sessionDuration);
});
```
### Manual Metrics:
- Weekly code reviews (M3)
- Monthly user testing (M17)
- Sprint retrospectives (M25)
- Quarterly accessibility audits (M31)
---
## 10. Reporting Format
### Weekly Progress Report:
```
# Week N Progress Report
## Development Metrics:
- Velocity: 23 points (target: 20-25) ✅
- Sprint goal: 85% complete ⚠️
- Bugs: 2 high, 5 medium ✅
- Test coverage: 88% ⚠️ (target: 90%)
## Performance:
- AI response time: 450ms ✅
- Page load: 800ms ✅
- Bundle size: 95KB ✅
## Blockers:
- Castling edge case failing tests (in progress)
## Next Week Focus:
- Reach 90% test coverage
- Complete Phase 1 features
- Fix high-severity bugs
```
---
## Conclusion
**32 Success Metrics Defined** across 6 categories:
1. Technical Quality (25%)
2. Performance (20%)
3. User Experience (20%)
4. Feature Adoption (10%)
5. Business/Project (10%)
6. Accessibility (5%)
**Critical Success Factors**:
- 100% chess rules compliance
- Zero critical bugs
- ≥ 90% test coverage
- AI response times < 1s
- Lighthouse score > 90
- On-time delivery
**Review Cadence**:
- Daily: Bug counts, build status
- Weekly: Development velocity, technical metrics
- Monthly: User metrics, milestone progress
- Release: Full scorecard review
**Success Threshold**:
- Pass ALL 6 critical metrics
- Pass ≥ 80% of high-priority metrics
- Pass ≥ 60% of medium-priority metrics
**Measurement Tools**:
- Jest (test coverage)
- Lighthouse (performance)
- Chrome DevTools (profiling)
- Analytics (user behavior)
- Manual testing (usability)
With this measurement framework, **success is objectively defined and trackable** throughout the project lifecycle.