5ad0700b41
Restructured project from nested workspace pattern to flat single-repo layout. This eliminates redundant nesting and consolidates all project files under version control. ## Migration Summary **Before:** ``` alex/ (workspace, not versioned) ├── chess-game/ (git repo) │ ├── js/, css/, tests/ │ └── index.html └── docs/ (planning, not versioned) ``` **After:** ``` alex/ (git repo, everything versioned) ├── js/, css/, tests/ ├── index.html ├── docs/ (project documentation) ├── planning/ (historical planning docs) ├── .gitea/ (CI/CD) └── CLAUDE.md (configuration) ``` ## Changes Made ### Structure Consolidation - Moved all chess-game/ contents to root level - Removed redundant chess-game/ subdirectory - Flattened directory structure (eliminated one nesting level) ### Documentation Organization - Moved chess-game/docs/ → docs/ (project documentation) - Moved alex/docs/ → planning/ (historical planning documents) - Added CLAUDE.md (workspace configuration) - Added IMPLEMENTATION_PROMPT.md (original project prompt) ### Version Control Improvements - All project files now under version control - Planning documents preserved in planning/ folder - Merged .gitignore files (workspace + project) - Added .claude/ agent configurations ### File Updates - Updated .gitignore to include both workspace and project excludes - Moved README.md to root level - All import paths remain functional (relative paths unchanged) ## Benefits ✅ **Simpler Structure** - One level of nesting removed ✅ **Complete Versioning** - All documentation now in git ✅ **Standard Layout** - Matches open-source project conventions ✅ **Easier Navigation** - Direct access to all project files ✅ **CI/CD Compatible** - All workflows still functional ## Technical Validation - ✅ Node.js environment verified - ✅ Dependencies installed successfully - ✅ Dev server starts and responds - ✅ All core files present and accessible - ✅ Git repository functional ## Files Preserved **Implementation Files:** - js/ (3,517 lines of code) - css/ (4 stylesheets) - tests/ (87 test cases) - index.html - package.json **CI/CD Pipeline:** - .gitea/workflows/ci.yml - .gitea/workflows/release.yml **Documentation:** - docs/ (12+ documentation files) - planning/ (historical planning materials) - README.md **Configuration:** - jest.config.js, babel.config.cjs, playwright.config.js - .gitignore (merged) - CLAUDE.md 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
400 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
400 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Complexity Analysis: HTML Chess Game
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
**Total Estimated Effort**: 80-120 hours
|
|
**Complexity Rating**: Medium-High (7/10)
|
|
**Recommended Team Size**: 3-4 developers
|
|
**Timeline**: 4-6 weeks for MVP, 8-12 weeks for full implementation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Component Complexity Breakdown
|
|
|
|
### 1.1 Core Chess Engine (HIGH COMPLEXITY)
|
|
**Effort**: 30-40 hours | **Complexity**: 9/10
|
|
|
|
#### Components:
|
|
- **Move Validation** (12-15 hours)
|
|
- Piece-specific move rules (Pawn, Knight, Bishop, Rook, Queen, King)
|
|
- Path obstruction detection
|
|
- Capture validation
|
|
- En passant special move
|
|
- Castling validation (4 conditions)
|
|
|
|
- **Game State Management** (8-10 hours)
|
|
- Board representation (8x8 matrix)
|
|
- Move history tracking
|
|
- Undo/Redo functionality
|
|
- Position hashing for repetition detection
|
|
|
|
- **Check & Checkmate Detection** (10-15 hours)
|
|
- King threat analysis
|
|
- Legal move calculation under check
|
|
- Checkmate/Stalemate detection
|
|
- Pinned pieces handling
|
|
- Discovery check patterns
|
|
|
|
**Critical Challenges**:
|
|
- Edge cases in castling (king/rook moved, check path, occupied squares)
|
|
- En passant timing (only immediately after pawn double-move)
|
|
- Stalemate detection (no legal moves but not in check)
|
|
- Three-fold repetition and 50-move rule
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 1.2 User Interface (MEDIUM COMPLEXITY)
|
|
**Effort**: 20-25 hours | **Complexity**: 6/10
|
|
|
|
#### Components:
|
|
- **Board Rendering** (6-8 hours)
|
|
- 8x8 grid with alternating colors
|
|
- Piece rendering (SVG or Unicode)
|
|
- Coordinate labels (a-h, 1-8)
|
|
- Responsive sizing
|
|
|
|
- **Interaction Handlers** (8-10 hours)
|
|
- Click-to-select piece
|
|
- Click-to-move destination
|
|
- Drag-and-drop support
|
|
- Move highlighting
|
|
- Legal move indicators
|
|
|
|
- **Visual Feedback** (6-7 hours)
|
|
- Selected piece highlighting
|
|
- Last move highlighting
|
|
- Check indicator
|
|
- Capture animations
|
|
- Piece promotion modal
|
|
|
|
**Critical Challenges**:
|
|
- Touch vs mouse event handling
|
|
- Drag preview on mobile devices
|
|
- Animation performance (60fps target)
|
|
- Accessibility (keyboard navigation)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 1.3 AI Opponent (HIGH COMPLEXITY)
|
|
**Effort**: 25-35 hours | **Complexity**: 8/10
|
|
|
|
#### Components:
|
|
- **Minimax Algorithm** (10-12 hours)
|
|
- Recursive game tree exploration
|
|
- Alpha-beta pruning optimization
|
|
- Configurable depth (3-5 ply for beginners, 6-8 for advanced)
|
|
|
|
- **Position Evaluation** (8-10 hours)
|
|
- Material counting (piece values)
|
|
- Positional scoring (center control, king safety)
|
|
- Piece-square tables
|
|
- Endgame vs opening/middlegame heuristics
|
|
|
|
- **Opening Book** (4-5 hours)
|
|
- Common opening moves database
|
|
- Random variation selection
|
|
- Transposition handling
|
|
|
|
- **Performance Optimization** (3-8 hours)
|
|
- Move ordering (captures first)
|
|
- Transposition tables
|
|
- Web Worker for non-blocking computation
|
|
- Iterative deepening
|
|
|
|
**Critical Challenges**:
|
|
- Search depth vs response time tradeoff
|
|
- Memory usage for transposition tables
|
|
- UI freezing during computation (Web Workers required)
|
|
- Balancing difficulty levels
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 1.4 Game Features (MEDIUM COMPLEXITY)
|
|
**Effort**: 15-20 hours | **Complexity**: 5/10
|
|
|
|
#### Components:
|
|
- **Move History** (5-6 hours)
|
|
- Algebraic notation generation
|
|
- Move list display
|
|
- Navigation (jump to move)
|
|
- PGN export/import
|
|
|
|
- **Game Controls** (4-5 hours)
|
|
- New game
|
|
- Undo/Redo
|
|
- Flip board
|
|
- Resign/Offer draw
|
|
|
|
- **Settings & Themes** (6-9 hours)
|
|
- Board color themes
|
|
- Piece set selection
|
|
- Sound effects toggle
|
|
- Animation speed control
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Technical Complexity Metrics
|
|
|
|
### Code Complexity (Estimated)
|
|
|
|
| Component | Lines of Code | Cyclomatic Complexity | Test Coverage Target |
|
|
|-----------|---------------|----------------------|---------------------|
|
|
| Chess Engine | 1500-2000 | High (20-30) | 95% |
|
|
| Move Validation | 600-800 | Very High (30-40) | 98% |
|
|
| AI Engine | 1000-1200 | High (15-25) | 85% |
|
|
| UI Components | 800-1000 | Medium (10-15) | 80% |
|
|
| State Management | 400-600 | Medium (10-15) | 90% |
|
|
| Utilities | 300-400 | Low (5-10) | 95% |
|
|
| **TOTAL** | **4600-6000** | **Average: 18-23** | **90%** |
|
|
|
|
### Algorithmic Complexity
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Frequency |
|
|
|-----------|----------------|------------------|-----------|
|
|
| Move Generation | O(n²) worst case | O(n) | Every move |
|
|
| Check Detection | O(n²) | O(1) | Every move |
|
|
| Minimax (depth d) | O(b^d) ~O(35^6) | O(d) | AI turns |
|
|
| Position Evaluation | O(n) | O(1) | Every node |
|
|
| Legal Move Check | O(n) | O(1) | User clicks |
|
|
| Board Rendering | O(64) = O(1) | O(64) = O(1) | Every update |
|
|
|
|
**Notes**:
|
|
- n = number of pieces (~32 at start, decreases)
|
|
- b = branching factor (~35 average in chess)
|
|
- d = search depth (4-8 typical)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Implementation Phases by Complexity
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: MVP (Core Functionality) - 40-50 hours
|
|
**Complexity**: Medium | **Priority**: CRITICAL
|
|
|
|
1. Basic board rendering (8 hours)
|
|
2. Piece movement without validation (4 hours)
|
|
3. Basic move validation (king, queen, rook, bishop, knight) (12 hours)
|
|
4. Pawn movement with promotion (6 hours)
|
|
5. Check detection (8 hours)
|
|
6. Checkmate detection (8 hours)
|
|
7. Basic UI controls (new game, undo) (4 hours)
|
|
|
|
**Deliverable**: Playable two-player chess game
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Enhanced Features - 25-35 hours
|
|
**Complexity**: Medium-High | **Priority**: HIGH
|
|
|
|
1. Castling implementation (8 hours)
|
|
2. En passant (6 hours)
|
|
3. Move history with algebraic notation (6 hours)
|
|
4. Drag-and-drop interface (5 hours)
|
|
5. Move animations (4 hours)
|
|
6. Sound effects (3 hours)
|
|
7. Board themes (3 hours)
|
|
|
|
**Deliverable**: Polished two-player experience
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: AI Opponent - 25-35 hours
|
|
**Complexity**: High | **Priority**: HIGH
|
|
|
|
1. Minimax algorithm (10 hours)
|
|
2. Alpha-beta pruning (5 hours)
|
|
3. Position evaluation function (8 hours)
|
|
4. Web Worker integration (4 hours)
|
|
5. Difficulty levels (3 types) (5 hours)
|
|
6. Opening book (3 hours)
|
|
|
|
**Deliverable**: Single-player mode vs AI
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Advanced Features - 15-20 hours
|
|
**Complexity**: Medium | **Priority**: MEDIUM
|
|
|
|
1. PGN import/export (6 hours)
|
|
2. Stalemate/draw detection (50-move, repetition) (6 hours)
|
|
3. Time controls (5 hours)
|
|
4. Game analysis mode (8 hours)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Phase 5: Polish & Optimization - 10-15 hours
|
|
**Complexity**: Medium | **Priority**: LOW
|
|
|
|
1. Performance optimization (5 hours)
|
|
2. Accessibility improvements (3 hours)
|
|
3. Mobile responsiveness (4 hours)
|
|
4. Cross-browser testing (3 hours)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 4. Most Challenging Components
|
|
|
|
### Ranked by Technical Difficulty:
|
|
|
|
1. **Checkmate/Stalemate Detection** (10/10)
|
|
- Must enumerate all legal moves
|
|
- Handle pinned pieces correctly
|
|
- Distinguish check/checkmate/stalemate
|
|
- Edge cases are numerous
|
|
|
|
2. **AI Minimax with Alpha-Beta** (9/10)
|
|
- Complex recursive algorithm
|
|
- Performance critical (must be fast)
|
|
- Requires sophisticated evaluation function
|
|
- Memory management for transposition tables
|
|
|
|
3. **Move Validation (Special Moves)** (8/10)
|
|
- Castling: 4+ conditions to check
|
|
- En passant: timing-dependent
|
|
- Pinned pieces: must simulate move removal
|
|
- Discovery checks
|
|
|
|
4. **Position Evaluation Function** (7/10)
|
|
- Balancing multiple factors
|
|
- Phase-dependent (opening/endgame)
|
|
- Piece-square tables require tuning
|
|
- King safety is context-dependent
|
|
|
|
5. **Web Worker Integration** (6/10)
|
|
- Message passing overhead
|
|
- State serialization
|
|
- Error handling across threads
|
|
- Debugging complexity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 5. Complexity Reduction Strategies
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Simplifications for MVP:
|
|
|
|
1. **Defer AI to Phase 3**
|
|
- Start with two-player only
|
|
- Reduces initial complexity by 40%
|
|
|
|
2. **Simplified Move Validation**
|
|
- Implement basic moves first
|
|
- Add castling/en passant in Phase 2
|
|
- Saves 8-10 hours initially
|
|
|
|
3. **Basic UI First**
|
|
- Click-to-select only (no drag-drop)
|
|
- No animations initially
|
|
- Saves 6-8 hours
|
|
|
|
4. **Minimal Draw Detection**
|
|
- Only checkmate/stalemate
|
|
- Defer 50-move rule and repetition
|
|
- Saves 4-6 hours
|
|
|
|
### Progressive Enhancement Path:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Week 1-2: Basic playable chess (two-player)
|
|
Week 3: Polish UI and special moves
|
|
Week 4-5: AI opponent implementation
|
|
Week 6: Testing, optimization, edge cases
|
|
Week 7-8: Advanced features and analytics
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 6. Skill Requirements by Component
|
|
|
|
| Component | JavaScript | Algorithms | Chess Rules | UI/UX |
|
|
|-----------|-----------|------------|-------------|-------|
|
|
| Chess Engine | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
|
|
| AI Opponent | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
|
|
| UI Layer | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
|
|
| State Management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
|
|
| Testing | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
|
|
|
|
**Recommended Team Composition**:
|
|
- 1x Chess Engine Developer (strong algorithms)
|
|
- 1x AI/Algorithms Developer (minimax expertise)
|
|
- 1x Frontend Developer (UI/UX focus)
|
|
- 1x QA Engineer (chess knowledge helpful)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 7. Complexity Comparison
|
|
|
|
### Similar Projects Complexity:
|
|
|
|
| Project Type | Relative Complexity | Estimated Hours |
|
|
|-------------|-------------------|----------------|
|
|
| Tic-Tac-Toe | 1x (baseline) | 10-15 |
|
|
| Checkers | 3x | 30-45 |
|
|
| **Chess** | **6-8x** | **80-120** |
|
|
| Go | 12-15x | 150-200 |
|
|
| Multiplayer Chess | 10-12x | 120-150 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 8. Risk Factors Affecting Complexity
|
|
|
|
| Risk Factor | Impact on Complexity | Mitigation |
|
|
|-------------|---------------------|------------|
|
|
| Lack of chess expertise | +30% time | Hire chess player or study rules deeply |
|
|
| Performance requirements | +20% time | Early profiling, Web Workers |
|
|
| Cross-browser issues | +15% time | Progressive enhancement, testing |
|
|
| AI difficulty tuning | +25% time | Iterative testing with users |
|
|
| Mobile support | +20% time | Responsive design from start |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 9. Validation Checkpoint Questions
|
|
|
|
Before starting, answer these to reduce complexity risks:
|
|
|
|
1. **Do we need AI immediately?** (If no, save 30% initial effort)
|
|
2. **Is mobile support required?** (Adds 20% complexity)
|
|
3. **What's the minimum viable feature set?** (Define clear scope)
|
|
4. **Do we have chess expertise on team?** (Critical for validation)
|
|
5. **What's the performance target?** (Affects architecture choices)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 10. Complexity Summary
|
|
|
|
### Low Complexity (1-3/10):
|
|
- Board rendering
|
|
- Basic piece movement
|
|
- UI controls (buttons)
|
|
- Settings persistence
|
|
|
|
### Medium Complexity (4-6/10):
|
|
- Move history
|
|
- Drag-and-drop
|
|
- Themes and styling
|
|
- Sound effects
|
|
- PGN export
|
|
|
|
### High Complexity (7-8/10):
|
|
- Move validation (special moves)
|
|
- Position evaluation
|
|
- Web Workers integration
|
|
- Performance optimization
|
|
|
|
### Very High Complexity (9-10/10):
|
|
- Check/checkmate detection
|
|
- Minimax with alpha-beta
|
|
- Transposition tables
|
|
- Full rules compliance
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
The HTML chess game is a **medium-high complexity project** requiring:
|
|
- Strong algorithmic skills
|
|
- Deep chess rules knowledge
|
|
- Solid JavaScript/frontend expertise
|
|
- 80-120 hours of focused development
|
|
|
|
**Key Success Factor**: Start with a minimal MVP (Phase 1), validate with users, then incrementally add complexity in later phases.
|
|
|
|
**Biggest Risk**: Underestimating the complexity of chess rules edge cases and checkmate detection. Recommend allocating 20% buffer time for debugging these components.
|